News
Officer fiddles council minutes
THE PEMBROKESHIRE HERALD understands that a senior officer in the County Council’s Development Directorate has undergone disciplinary proceedings for altering the minutes kept of several European grant-awarding panel meetings to put a more favourable gloss on the scrutiny that took place.
Writing on his website, Hakin Councillor Mike Stoddart explained how last year he submitted a Freedom of Information request to obtain the minutes of several panel meetings where applications for European funding were evaluated and approved. Cllr Stoddart duly received the minutes, but says he received an email out of the blue last week from County Hall stating that after he submitted his request, the minutes were significantly altered with the result that the documents Cllr Stoddart was sent as a true record of the panel meetings, were materially different to what had been approved by the panel.
Cllr Stoddart told The Herald: “Some of the amendments are trivial and some less so, but the point is that someone within the authority thought fit to make these alterations.”
“While most of the alterations are merely concerned with tidying up the grammar, those regarding No 29 Dimond Street, Pembroke Dock, involve substantial additions to the text and seem to have been designed to give the impression that the Grant Panel’s evaluation of this application was a good deal more rigorous than indicated by the original minutes.”
The re-writing of such public records is a damning indictment on the authority’s handling of publicly-funded grant cash for property development projects, which has been reported for over a year in the Herald and our sister publication, Pembrokeshire’s Best.
Officers’ role questioned
Allegations of questionable practice have dogged two European-funded property grant schemes in Pembroke and Pembroke Dock since Pembrokeshire’s Best magazine uncovered in 2012 that the majority of monies for multiple projects in Pembroke Dock had gone to a single developer, Cathal McCosker, who had used a maze of pop-up companies to avoid restrictions intended to cap grant money awarded to grant applicants.
In January 2013 it emerged that Cathal McCosker had been granted a licence for bedsits by the County Council in the former National Westminster Bank building in Meyrick Street Pembroke Dock. Those bedsits had been built in a flagrant breach of the planning permission granted by the Council, who turned a blind eye to the developer’s conduct and the well known complaints and behaviour logged by the emergency services as a result of overcrowding. An application for retrospective planning permission for the bedsits was submitted by Mr McCosker, which officers intended to approve under delegater powers, however the local member Cllr Alison Lee called it in to be determined by the committee. Amid public outcry and angry scenes, only the officers and a few ruling IPPG councillors backed the Irish developer’s application for approval, and the application was refused.
Following refusal, and amid strong local opposition to his scheme to develop more bedsits, Mr McCosker subsequently withdrew from other plans he had announced to develop properties in Pembroke near the castle, which had not been required to go to tender by the County Council. In particular, it emerged that Mr McCosker had been accompanied to a key meeting by Council officers to assist his “pitch” for those plans to Pembroke Town Council.
Last year, Pembrokeshire’s Best Magazine revealed that Council officers in the local authority’s Planning Department had acknowledged Police reports of anti-social behaviour in the Meyrick Street bedsits development but withheld that information from members of the Planning Committee.
The Herald then obtained further information which suggested that officers used a contrived definition of its obligations to provide “affordable housing” for those in need, in order to justify the construction of bedsits, widely regarded as Housing Benefit magnets for private developers and a blight upon any hope for economic regeneration of commercial properties.
Cllr Mike Stoddart continued to press the Council for answers to questions about the works supposedly carried out under the scheme and the way in which public money had been lavished on building bedsits in the commercial heart of Pembroke Dock.
His efforts were met with obstruction by officers and repeated attacks on his integrity by IPPG Cabinet member Cllr David Pugh, who at a meeting in December received the support of barely a third of Councillors in a no confidence vote, and had the grants schemes responsibility removed from his cabinet portfolio and handed to Cllr David Simpson.
After a reversal of position by the Council’s Monitoring Officer Laurence Harding on the legal stance, it was agreed that the law allowed the documents sought by Cllr Stoddart to be made available for inspection by all councillors, which also allowed copies to be taken. Shortly thereafter the Police were called in by the Council following representations made to Mark Lewis, Director of Finance and Leisure, by Cllr Stoddart and Cllr Jacob Williams after discoveries they made in the files.
The council refused to confirm or deny the identity of the officer who has been disciplined for tampering with the grant panel meetings minutes, following emails sent by the Herald.
The council also refused to confirm or deny what disciplinary action has been taken against the officer, and if they have been suspended to prevent further documents held by the council being tampered with, in light of the ongoing Police investigation into the grant schemes.
The only response the Herald received from the council came from a spokesperson who said:
“Pembrokeshire County Council’s Audit Committee will be reviewing how the Council deals with grants. As the matter has been referred to the Police, the County Council will not be making any further comment at this time.”
Audit Committee take action on grants
Yesterday (Thursday, April 24) the Council’s Audit Committee considered the ongoing issue and briefly discussed the alterations made by the unnamed officer, of the record of grant panel meetings. The Monitoring Officer Laurence Harding told the committee that the officer responsible had been disciplined, but added that he could not reveal who it was nor could he say what punishment was given out.
Cllr Jacob Williams told other members: “There are two recent developments that I’m aware of with which I’m very uncomfortable: firstly the fact that the minutes of the grant panel have been edited by an unnamed member of staff. That to me is very frightening.
“The second matter is that at the cabinet meeting in early April, an updated report was presented in which WEFO (the Welsh European Funding Office) requested that the Council sends them a response.
“I have now received a copy of the confidential report the council sent in response to WEFO, and I’m absolutely appalled at it. It’s shocking to me, knowing what I do about what’s happened, and as councillors you are all entitled to see it and I urge you to, you’ll be amazed at what has been said – I can’t believe anybody thought this was a fit and accurate representation of what’s gone on here”.
Cllr David Simpson, who recently took over control of the Council’s public works grants schemes from Cllr David Pugh, said: “We should be looking at a full internal audit into the process on one of the units. A full audit by the authority to look at the process, to see where we started at, the process in its implementation, how grants were paid, the staff that were involved”.
Independent lay-Chair of the committee, John Evans MBE, responded saying: “We should start something now to learn lessons as quickly as possible.
“By taking one and learning the lessons as quickly as possible from that, so we need to learn those lessons quickly to rebuild the confidence of others in the organisation so that we can move forward”.
Cllr Mike James added: “Time is of the essence”.
As a result of their deliberations, the Audit Committee agreed that a management review should take place in respect of the grants process for 29 Dimond Street, Pembroke Dock, as quickly as possible, which will return to a reconvened extraordinary meeting at a date which has not yet been set.
It was also agreed that the two matters raised by Cllr Jacob Williams – the tampering of documents and the response the council sent to WEFO – would also be discussed when the extraordinary meeting reconvened, though this is likely to be behind-closed-doors in private session, where the press and public are excluded.
Community
50s women threaten legal action over pension compensation refusal
Campaigners say government decision ‘irrational and unlawful’ as ministers defend position
WOMEN born in the 1950s are threatening a Judicial Review after the UK Government refused to introduce a compensation scheme for those affected by changes to the State Pension age.
Campaign groups representing thousands of women across Wales say the decision by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions is “legally flawed and procedurally unsafe”, arguing that ministers have relied on incomplete evidence while ignoring long-standing claims of maladministration and discrimination.

But the UK Government maintains that, while mistakes were made in communication, there is insufficient evidence that most women suffered direct financial loss as a result.
The row centres on the long-running dispute over changes to the State Pension age, which saw the retirement age for women rise from sixty to sixty-six, bringing it into line with men. Many women say they were given little or no notice, leaving them unable to plan financially.
Ombudsman findings
In 2024, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) concluded that the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was guilty of maladministration in how it communicated the changes.
The Ombudsman recommended compensation, suggesting payments could range from £1,000 to nearly £3,000 depending on impact.
However, in December, Paymaster General Pat McFadden MP said the Government would not implement a blanket compensation scheme, arguing that evidence did not show widespread financial injustice directly caused by the communication failures.
Campaigners say that stance is wrong in law.
‘Not new evidence’
Groups including 1950s Women of Wales & Beyond, 50s Women United, and Pension Partners for Justice claim ministers relied on what they described as “new evidence” to justify rejecting compensation.
They argue the material had already been available for years and therefore provides “no lawful basis” to overturn the Ombudsman’s conclusions.
In a statement, a spokesperson said: “To accept maladministration while denying financial loss is internally inconsistent.
“The Department’s failure deprived women of the opportunity to make informed decisions about retirement. Many incurred real, quantifiable losses – from depleted savings to forced early retirement and reliance on benefits.”
Campaigners also claim key testimony from former DWP ministers was omitted from the Ombudsman investigation, and that evidence of discrimination was not fully considered.
They say relying on what they call an “incomplete and selective report” leaves the Government open to legal challenge.
Political pressure in Wales
The issue has also been raised in the Senedd.
Plaid Cymru Deputy Leader Delyth Jewell MS recently pressed Welsh ministers to back affected women and push for engagement with campaigners.
Organiser Jackie Gilderdale said many Welsh women feel excluded from discussions.
“This campaign is not a brand or a limited company – it is real women whose lives were turned upside down,” she said.
“We don’t want another court battle. We want dialogue and a political solution. But if the door remains closed, Judicial Review remains an option.”
A petition calling for structured mediation between government and representative groups has already gathered more than 34,000 signatures.
Government position
The UK Government has previously said that most women were aware of the changes and that modelling showed limited evidence of widespread direct financial loss caused solely by communication failures.
Ministers have also pointed to the overall cost of compensation, which could run into billions of pounds.
Public law experts note that while maladministration findings are serious, compensation is not automatic and governments retain discretion over how – or whether – to implement financial redress.
Long-running dispute
The dispute has been ongoing for more than a decade and has become one of the most persistent pension justice campaigns in the UK.
Women’s groups argue many lost up to six years of expected pension income, with some estimating personal losses of tens of thousands of pounds.
Successive governments, however, have resisted calls for mass compensation, saying equalising the pension age was necessary for fairness and sustainability of the system.
For many campaigners, the fight is far from over.
“We are not going away,” the groups said.
Education
Funding axe falls on Welsh digital education scheme as £1.4m handed to English uni
Face-to-face training replaced with online resources in decision branded a ‘slap in the face’ for Wales
A LONG-RUNNING Welsh digital education programme that has trained thousands of teachers and pupils every year is facing an uncertain future after Welsh Government funding was cut and redirected to an English university.
Technocamps, a Swansea University-based project which has operated across Wales for twenty-two years, has described the decision as a major blow to digital skills development, with staff already losing jobs and schools left without in-person support.
Instead of renewing Technocamps’ funding, ministers have awarded £1.4 million under the Curriculum for Wales Grant Support Programme to the University of York to deliver mainly online learning resources, with only limited face-to-face sessions in what are described as “priority areas”.
Critics say the move risks replacing hands-on, bilingual classroom support with generic remote materials.
Each year Technocamps provides direct training to more than 900 teachers and delivers workshops to over 30,000 young people in schools across Wales, working face-to-face with pupils to improve coding, computing and digital literacy.
The programme has been widely credited with helping schools meet the growing demands of the Curriculum for Wales and tackling shortages in specialist computing skills.
‘Bitter disappointment’
Plaid Cymru MS Sioned Williams, who represents South Wales West, said she had met the Technocamps team again this month and would be writing to the Cabinet Secretary for Education seeking answers.
She said: “The necessity of good quality, face-to-face digital skills training has never been more important in this digital age.
“I’ve seen firsthand how engaging and effective a Technocamps workshop is and what makes this programme so great is that it is made in Wales, delivered bilingually through our network of universities and is able to reach every school and teacher.
“That’s why the news that Welsh Government has cut funding is so bitterly disappointing.
“At a time when Welsh universities are in financial crisis, it’s an additional slap in the face that what little funding has been allocated has gone to a university in England.”
Jobs lost across Wales
Beti Williams MBE, the programme’s founder and patron, said the funding decision had already resulted in redundancies.
She said: “The end of Technocamps funding has led to the unemployment of teacher trainers at universities across Wales, leaving nearly 1,000 school teachers who rely on our bespoke in-person training and support in limbo.
“Replacing Technocamps with predominantly standard online courses is an insult to Welsh universities. Online courses, of which there is unlimited choice, offer nothing to struggling teachers who rely on tailored, face-to-face help.”
A petition calling for funding to be restored has gathered more than 4,000 signatures and is now being considered by the Senedd Petitions Committee.
Questions over value for money
The decision has also raised questions about value for money.
According to supporters, the £1.4m grant awarded to York is almost double Technocamps’ previous annual funding, yet delivers fewer in-person services.
There are also concerns that only seven per cent of the wider Curriculum for Wales grant funding over the next three years is allocated to science and technology subjects.
Education campaigners warn that reducing practical support in computing and digital technology could widen skills gaps at a time when Wales is trying to attract high-tech industries and improve economic productivity.
Digital divide fears
Teachers have long argued that in-person training is essential, particularly for schools with limited IT expertise or rural connectivity challenges.
Technocamps staff say online-only provision risks leaving some schools behind.
Ms Williams added: “It’s so important that we keep this crucial skills and knowledge in Wales. The thought that we could lose this valuable resource makes no sense at a time when the need for digital competency has never been greater.”
Welsh Government has been asked to explain why the funding was awarded outside Wales and whether the impact on Welsh university jobs and school support was assessed before the decision was made.
Entertainment
Turner and Constable brought to life on the big screen at the Torch Theatre
ART lovers in Pembrokeshire will have the chance to experience the lives and rivalries of two of Britain’s greatest painters when a new documentary, EOS: Turner & Constable, arrives at the Torch Theatre this March.
Celebrating the 250th anniversary of their births, the film explores the intertwined stories and enduring legacies of J.M.W. Turner and John Constable alongside Tate Britain’s major new exhibition. Exhibition on Screen has been granted exclusive behind-the-scenes access, bringing their extraordinary art and personal histories vividly to the cinema screen.
Born just a year apart, Turner and Constable helped redefine landscape painting in Britain – and were fierce competitors. Both captured a nation in transition, yet their styles could not have been more different. Turner’s dramatic skies, blazing sunsets and atmospheric scenes from his travels contrasted sharply with Constable’s gentle, nostalgic portrayals of the English countryside and familiar rural life.
Their opposing visions divided critics and audiences alike, famously described at the time as a clash of “fire and water”.
The documentary offers rare, intimate access to sketchbooks, letters and personal artefacts, alongside insights from leading curators and art historians. It also ties in with Tate Britain’s landmark exhibition, running in London from November 2025 to April 2026, which reunites the two masters’ works side-by-side.
This cinematic event gives audiences the chance to see their masterpieces in stunning detail and discover unexpected sides to two artists whose rivalry shaped British art history.
Turner and Constable will be screened at the Torch Theatre on Sunday, March 15 at 4:30pm.
Tickets are £13. For bookings, visit www.torchtheatre.co.uk or call the Box Office on 01646 695267.
-
Health7 days agoHealth Board to decide on future model for nine clinical services
-
Health2 days agoConsultation reveals lack of public trust in health board
-
News3 days agoCaldey still unsafe, survivors warn — despite Abbey’s reform claims
-
Community3 days agoPembrokeshire students speak at national Holocaust Memorial Day event
-
Climate7 days agoPetition opposing climate emergency reaffirmation and ‘tax hikes’ to be heard
-
Crime7 days agoPay boost for over 1,000 Pembrokeshire school support staff pledged by Labour
-
Business7 days agoPembroke Dock battery box energy scheme is approved
-
News5 days agoWales warned against single police force as Lib Dems cite Scotland ‘lesson’












Jonathan
April 25, 2014 at 7:30 pm
About time this is found out Cathals properties are poor quality for a private let lock him away and throw away the key 🙂
Welshman 23
April 25, 2014 at 10:46 pm
One disaster to another what are the hierarchy going to do now. Cover up. It’s about time names of the individual should be made public. What this person has done is illegal and a should be added to the list currently being investigated by the police
les
April 26, 2014 at 8:11 am
surely the altering of minutes is a misconduct in public office. the police should step in whether invited or not,especially given the apparent “governance issues” at PCC.
Keanjo
April 27, 2014 at 11:08 am
A very thorough report on this topic. Congratulations, please keep on with your investigative journalism into the shambles at County Hall.
Teifion
April 28, 2014 at 9:24 am
It’s a great pity Bryn, the other senior managers and our councillors have never heard of The Nolan Principles of honesty, accountability, openness, objectivity, transparency and leadership
Archie
May 14, 2014 at 9:47 pm
What a refreshing change to read all about the trials and tribulations going on within PCC, This paper is a credit to investigative journalism, but don’t stay rooted in County Hall, there is a lot to report in some of our wayward Community councils, St Florence and Manorbier to name just two!
Phil
December 3, 2014 at 10:14 am
This bastard needs to sort his plumbing out. Look at the flowers, just keep looking at the flowers!