News
MINUTES MEDDLER UNMASKED
Another Pembrokeshire Herald Exclusive
THE WEEK before last the Herald exclusively revealed that an unnamed senior officer at Pembrokeshire County Council tampered with the minutes of panel meetings where applications for European cash grants for notorious building restoration projects in Pembroke and Pembroke Dock were considered.
The grant schemes are mired in controversy and in February the council had no option but to self-refer allegations of fraud to the police after clear evidence came to light in one project of favourable treatment in the tendering process to the successful building contractor.
The county council is protecting the identity of the officer who tampered with the grant panel minutes, however the Herald can now exclusively reveal it was GWYN EVANS, the authority’s key manager overseeing European funding.
In A scarcely believable twist of events, the Herald also understands after higher up council personnel became aware of the scale and nature of Mr Evans’ alterations to numerous grant panel meeting minutes, he underwent disciplinary proceedings resulting in just a WRITTEN WARNING.
Mr Evans has worked as ‘European Manager’ at Pembrokeshire County Council since August 1996 according to a publically accessible professional profile he created online.
His page on the popular vocational social networking site LinkedIn – the business sector equivalent of Facebook – outlines a comprehensive career in high profile European funding roles.
Previously working as a ‘Principal Admin Officer (EU Funds)’ at Bridgend College between 1994-1996, Mr Evans says on LinkedIn that his role there “involved overseeing the projects to ensure they complied with regulatory requirements and project closure,” and during the prior twelve year period he held ‘various accountancy positions’ at Mid Glamorgan County Council.
Under the ‘Skills & Expertise’ section of his LinkedIn profile, Mr Evans boasts dozens of talents including ‘Governance, Compliance, Project Management,’ ‘Contract Management,’ and ‘Report Writing.’ He also states he is a “Past chairman of Welsh European Officers Group.”
Fiddling with documents relating so closely to the grant scheme which is now under police investigation as well as internal review by the authority’s Audit Committee is something the council’s Plaid Cymru group leader, Cllr Michael Williams, told the Herald is “a shocking revelation.”
Cllr Williams, who’s served Tenby as a councillor for over 45 years and doesn’t know the identity of the officer, told the Herald: “Quite frankly I’m becoming lost for words. What on earth will be next? If elected members are no longer able to trust senior officers to properly record decisions and maintain council documents, then we are lost.”
Adding: “The entire basis of democratic accountability is seriously threatened by what has been going on in Pembrokeshire for too long now. I was elected first in 1968, and at that time I had complete faith in officers and fellow members. Under the present regime that trust has been seriously eroded, and it’s not hard to see why.”
The fact that Mr Evans tampered with the council’s records of grant panel meetings only recently came to light after he was brought to task by an internal disciplinary process. It is not known who discovered the alterations Mr Evans made, or how, but he made them directly following a Freedom of Information request submitted to the council by Milford Haven (Hakin) Councillor Mike Stoddart on 29 May 2013.
Cllr Stoddart’s FoI request sought copies of the minutes of all grant panel meetings of the Commercial Property Grant Scheme (CPGS). Following receipt of Cllr Stoddart’s request, Gwyn Evans made several alterations to the minutes of multiple panel meetings that have all been seen by the Herald, many of which make it appear as though more scrutiny of grant applications took place than was recorded in the unaltered minutes.
Following Mr Evans’s written warning, Cllr Mike Stoddart was sent a letter by the authority’s Head of IT and Central Support Services, John Roberts, outlining the alarming discovery and apologising that the documents disclosed to him under the FoI act in 2013 were not accurate as they had been fiddled with in-between his submission of the request, and the documents being provided to him.
All of the alterations were made to the minutes of grant panel meetings which recommended grant funding be awarded to properties owned by controversial developer Cathal McCosker, or companies of his. The panel, made up entirely of unelected officers, recommended that the council’s elected cabinet should formally award public cash for 10 Meyrick Street at a meeting held on 15 December 2011, 29 Dimond Street at a meeting on 13 February 2012, and 31 Dimond Street on 4 May 2012.
Many of the changes concerned the addition of detail and tidying up of sentences, but some also introduced completely new elements which were not included in the untampered minutes. Added to the minutes concerning 29 Dimond Street (occupied then, as now, by Paul Sartori charity shop) was a completely new sentence: “The Panel agreed that the existing photos showed the building to be in a poor state of repair and in clear need of renovation.”
Changes were not only written to conceal they were added in after the fact, but a further alteration to the 29 Dimond Street panel meeting minutes was cunningly crafted to imply panel members showed an element of foresight, by the addition of the text: “…whilst jobs created/accommodated and enterprises accommodated outputs are not expected in the short term (as the Sartori Charity Shop is expected to remain here in the immediate future), there is a possibility that a new enterprise may move into the premises before the end of the Programme.”
As well as pointing out all of the alterations that had been made, Mr Roberts sent Cllr Stoddart full copies of the original unedited documents, and referred in his letter to the relevant statute which relates to the “Offence of altering etc. records with intent to prevent disclosure.”
Section 77 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 was quoted, which states that any person is guilty of a criminal offence “if he alters, defaces, blocks, erases, destroys or conceals any record held by the public authority, with the intention of preventing the disclosure by that authority of all, or any part, of the information to the communication of which the applicant would have been entitled”.
Concluding his letter, Mr Roberts told Cllr Stoddart he would be making a formal referral of the matter to the relevant authorities: “I will be making the Information Commissioner’s Office aware of this matter in order that the Information Commissioner may give it consideration.”
The maximum fine that can be imposed following conviction of the crime of altering documents intended to prevent disclosure of information to which a person is entitled, is £5000, though where multiple documents are concerned, it is unclear if each would be treated as a separate charge under the legislation.
Crime
Milford man admits TV piracy offences linked to estimated £6m losses
Michael David Barrow, 48, of Priory Road, Milford Haven, will be sentenced at Swansea Crown Court after admitting supplying modified Fire Sticks and apps used to access subscription content illegally
A MILFORD HAVEN man has admitted a series of piracy offences said to have caused an estimated £6m loss to digital content providers including Amazon Prime, BT Sport and Sky.
Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court heard this week that Michael David Barrow, 48, operated over a five-year period, supplying adapted Amazon Fire TV sticks and apps that allowed customers to access paid television services without paying the usual subscription fees.
Prosecuting on behalf of the FA Premier League, Ari Alibhai KC told District Judge Mark Layton that the offending took place between October 2019 and February 2024.
“The offences concern the operation and supply of what is collectively termed a streaming service,” he said.
“This involved hardware such as Fire Sticks, but also app-based services to enable customers to access paid television services such as Sky, BT Sport and online videos which would normally attract a subscription fee, thus enabling customers to bypass the cost.”
The court heard that Barrow’s customer base was not limited to Pembrokeshire, but extended across the UK.
“According to Snap, he had around 1,800 users and was paid in cash as well as through PayPal,” said Mr Alibhai.
“It’s estimated that the defendant received approximately £213,000 while the scale of potential loss to the broadcasters is around £6m. This is not an exact sum, but it is indicative of the effects that this kind of piracy has.”
The prosecution said an aggravating feature of the case was that Barrow had previously been warned about his activities.
In 2021, he was sent a cease and desist notice telling him to stop supplying the illegal services.
“The notice indicated, in black and white, the potential consequences,” Mr Alibhai said. “He failed to respond.”
Barrow pleaded guilty to making and supplying applications, apps and other electronic data enabling access to paid television content without appropriate payment being made; supplying apps and other electronic data enabling access to pay television content without appropriate payment being made; and supplying Amazon Fire TV sticks which, when adapted, enabled access to pay television content without appropriate payment being made.
Given the seriousness of the offences, Judge Layton declined jurisdiction.
Barrow will now be sentenced at Swansea Crown Court on Tuesday (May 12). He was released on unconditional bail.
News
Starmer crisis deepens as Welsh Labour braces for Senedd vote
Fresh evidence over Peter Mandelson’s appointment has piled more pressure on the Prime Minister as Welsh Labour faces a grim polling picture just weeks before voters go to the polls
FRESH pressure was mounting on Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Tuesday (Apr 21) after former senior civil servant Sir Olly Robbins told MPs he faced “constant pressure” from Downing Street to speed Peter Mandelson into post as ambassador to Washington.
The evidence has deepened a row that has already sparked calls for Starmer to quit and threatens to overshadow Labour campaigns heading into the Senedd election on Thursday, May 7.
Robbins, who was sacked last week, told a parliamentary committee there had been an “atmosphere of constant chasing” and “frequent phone calls” from Starmer’s private office as ministers pushed to get Mandelson into the role quickly.
Starmer has admitted the appointment was wrong, but has blamed officials for not telling him that vetting advisers were leaning against clearance.
The timing could hardly be worse for Welsh Labour.
A new ITV Cymru Wales poll published on Tuesday evening put Plaid Cymru and Reform UK level on 29% each, with Labour back on 13 per cent, a result projected to leave the party with only about 12 seats.
The same poll suggested First Minister Eluned Morgan could even lose her own seat, underlining the scale of the threat facing Labour in Wales after decades of dominance.
That bleak picture was reinforced by separate modelling published on Monday (Apr 20), which suggested Labour could be pushed into third place altogether, behind both Plaid Cymru and Reform.
The wider UK backdrop is hardly helping. The latest Westminster voting intention figures put Labour on just 16 per cent, behind Reform UK on 27 per cent and also trailing both the Conservatives and the Greens on 17 per cent.
That suggests Starmer is now leading a government with a serious authority problem well beyond Westminster gossip or internal party grumbling.
Even inside Labour, the language has become more ominous. Ed Miliband said he feared Mandelson’s appointment could “blow up”, a remark that will do little to calm nerves among Labour candidates already facing angry voters on the doorstep.
Although Labour MPs are not believed to expect an immediate move to remove Starmer before the May elections, Robbins’ evidence is likely to heap even more pressure on the Prime Minister at the worst possible time.
For Welsh Labour, the danger is obvious.
Instead of fighting the Senedd election on devolved issues alone, the party now finds itself dragged back into a Westminster scandal centred on judgment, transparency and competence.
In a campaign where voters already appear to be looking for change, that is an ugly place to be.
Whether the Mandelson affair proves fatal to Starmer’s premiership remains to be seen. But with just over a fortnight until Wales goes to the polls, it is becoming harder for Labour to argue that events in London are not poisoning the brand in Cardiff Bay too.
News
Welsh Conservatives say they are ‘only party’ committed to protecting Withybush
PAUL DAVIES and Samuel Kurtz have reaffirmed that the Welsh Conservatives are the only political party to make an explicit manifesto commitment to protecting services at both Withybush Hospital and Bronglais Hospital.
At a time when health services across Mid and West Wales are under growing pressure, the lead Conservative candidates for Ceredigion Penfro say local people must continue to have access to safe, high-quality care close to home. They argue that means safeguarding and strengthening vital district general hospitals such as Withybush and Bronglais.
Both candidates say they have led sustained efforts to oppose further downgrades at Withybush Hospital, working closely with residents, campaigners and healthcare professionals. They have also backed community campaigns and stood alongside local people in defence of essential services.
In the Senedd, Paul Davies and Samuel Kurtz say they have repeatedly raised concerns about proposed service changes, challenged Welsh Government ministers and pressed for clear assurances over the future of local healthcare. They have also written directly to Hywel Dda University Health Board and the Health Minister calling for action to protect key services.
They say that, if re-elected, they will continue to stand up for local healthcare services regardless of which party forms the next Welsh Government.
Paul Davies said: “We have long been clear that any further downgrading of services at Withybush Hospital is unacceptable. We have stood with our communities, supported local campaigns and used every opportunity in the Senedd to fight for the services people rely on.
“The Welsh Conservatives are the only party to make an explicit commitment in our manifesto to protecting services at both Withybush and Bronglais hospitals. That shows a clear and unwavering commitment to safeguarding local healthcare in West Wales.”
Samuel Kurtz added: “People should not have to travel hours for treatment that could and should be delivered locally. We will continue to hold the Welsh Government to account, whoever forms it after May, to secure proper investment and ensure these hospitals remain at the heart of our communities.
“Let us be absolutely clear: we will be relentless in opposing any attempt to strip services from our rural hospitals, and we will not hesitate to challenge anyone who threatens their future.”
-
Business6 days agoMilford Haven dry dock pitched as home for giant £480m superyacht yard
-
Politics7 days agoWelsh Lib Dems promise childcare boost, social care reform in manifesto launch
-
News6 days agoHaverfordwest County AFC escapes winding-up order but ordered to pay costs
-
News7 days agoLabour split over Brawdy defence project as Eluned Morgan calls for project halt
-
Crime7 days agoWoman who called for help spared jail over blade offence
-
Community6 days agoFamily safe after major house fire in Letterston, community told
-
Sport6 days agoLockwood handed first Six Nations start as Joyce returns for Arms Park test
-
Business6 days agoTenby harbour RNLI building takeaway allowed after appeal









